Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

So I went to Port Richey today to see Walk the Line with the mother and the aunt. It was okay. Pretty good, as far as biopics go. Well-acted, and my mother and aunt (who grew up listening to Johnny Cash and June Carter) both really enjoyed it (though I'd say my 9 year-old niece has better taste in movies).

As a rule, biopics are rarely successful pieces of cinematography. Life is senseless and does not have those key elements that make a film...such as an inciting incident, and two major plot points, which separate a film into three roughly equal "acts." Beginning, middle, and end is not a way of life. So a biopic has to work too hard to tell an engaging story that involves some sort of conflict. Walk the Line felt weak, to me. It was a weak premise and weak story. I would have accepted it as a made-for-TV movie, but on the big screen, it has higher expectations.

Overall: Wait and rent it when it releases on DVD. It will be more enjoyable then. And you can admire how cute Reese Witherspoon is from the privacy of your own home (and she is adorable, as always).

This evening I watched Crash (which I had rented from Netflix) and I'd have to say that my first adjective to describe myself in response is "relieved." After the first half (about 55 minutes), it becomes clear that this is a movie about cause and reaction. Thus, the title is extremely fitting, and the first scene (which is a car accident) demonstrates this straight away. So it reached that 55 minute mark and I started to get worry. It was the "reaction" half, and that could mean a lot of violence and unnecessary death, which would be very impacting on an audience, but I was not in that kind of mood. I was relieved that most of the issues were resolved without death, though the film certainly keeps you on the edge of your seat, anxious for the next move to be made.

As far as story goes, I thought it was a really interesting look at racism in the US. It bordered on having too many storylines, which in turn would mean not spending enough time with any one situation and being left with surface characters. However, I think a vast majority of the characters had at least one attribute of depth so that you could understand their thoughts, feelings, and actions. Many of the storylines resonated and I think I'll have a better grasp of what I want to say about it after I've had more time to process.

In other news...it's opening weekend at Sundance. *sigh*


( 1 comment — Leave a comment )
Jan. 21st, 2006 05:26 pm (UTC)
In answer to your subject line: Uh huh!

I am glad to hear you say that about biopics, as I was just thinking the same thing yesterday while watching 'De-Lovely' with my roomie Loren and one the people she was interviewing for the band fraternity. It felt like that too. It's a life; the resolution of the story is a slow fade into old age and death, or a tragic early death that leaves one person behind lamenting the tragedy of the death. So it's never satisfying.

Instead, I went to Underworld: Evolution. Um. So there's this "love scene" that was soft-core porn, which would normally be great... except that the way they had the bodies so that you could see nice n low on Kate's tummy meant that Scott Speedman would have to have like a two-foot schlong. So... but they were both still hot, lots of leather.

Also. I made this icon with our particular... tastes... in mind. Hehe.
( 1 comment — Leave a comment )

Latest Month

July 2008


Page Summary

Powered by LiveJournal.com